Cases and Hearings before the Academic Integrity Committee
在以下情况下,委员会可以在没有正式听证会的情况下对案件进行审查(由学术诚信委员会进行论文审查):
- 由签署学术诚信表的学生同意
- 该学生知道该指控和处罚,但拒绝在表格上签字
- 任何一方都认为制裁的程度足够严重,有必要对此案进行审查.
学术诚信委员会的审查应在如上所述的人工智能听证委员会面对面会议上进行.
学术诚信委员会的审查或正式的听证会, the Academic Integrity Committee
- 是否应向教师和学生提供接收文件的时间表
- 必须及时提供与允许双方准备一致的文件(见上文1.)
委员会收到的所有文件必须提供给与案件有关的教师和学生.
'Documentation' refers to
- 违章:包含或体现了违反学术诚信的论文或考试
- 教员、被指控学生和其他被要求的个人的书面陈述
- other materials as appropriate to the incident.
学术诚信委员会保留要求可能拥有相关信息的个人提供额外陈述的权利.
Hearings before the Academic Integrity Committee
听证会应尽快安排,但在给予合理时间(如.g., 5个工作日)通知学生和教师这样的听证会, and allowing the student reasonable time to prepare.
如果需要举行正式听证会,主席有责任
- direct the hearing process
- rule on the admissibility of evidence
- rule on the relevance of information being presented
- 保持程序和绩效被认为是非反复无常和非武断的.
- vote only in case of a tie.
The burden of proof shall be guilt by clear and convincing evidence.
There shall be no lawyers present at this hearing.
应当听取案件的主要当事人和有有关情况的双方证人的证言.
根据学生的要求,大学相关的顾问可能会在场.
Audiocassette recording of the proceeding is an option, 但任何此类录音都是推荐十大正规网赌网站的财产,应与案件材料一起转交给学生责任部门. No other recordings are permitted. 学生可以根据录音做笔记(参考学生问责制的程序).
The student shall have the right to
- prior review of available evidence and documentation
- waive reasonable time and proceed as permitted
- be present throughout the hearing and hear all evidence
- be absent from the hearing
- provide testimony as defense
- question accusers and witnesses present
- review the written report of the committee.
The faculty member shall have the right to
- be present throughout the hearing and hear all evidence
- present the allegation of academic dishonesty to the committee.
人工智能听证委员会可以使用附录A先例指南作为一般指南, but may also consider the following in recommending a sanction:
- ethical or special reasons for sanctioning above or below precedent
- 结果将减少重复行为的可能性
- how the sanctions will serve the student and community needs
- opportunity for student growth
人工智能听证会委员会将在听证会结束后立即举行会议,起草报告. 人工智能听证委员会必须做出无罪或有罪的决定,并建议适当的制裁. 人工智能听证委员会然后向副院长提出要求,副院长将报告转交给学生问责局(见附录B)。. 副院长将与学生责任部门核实,以确定在实施学术制裁之前是否有任何违反学术诚信的行为. 如果学生以前有违规行为,建议的制裁可能会被审查和改变.
如果学生被发现违反了学术诚信,该报告将成为该学生的一部分?s formal educational record. (If the committee finds no violation to have occurred, 书面报告应提交给学生责任部门,并以符合大学程序的方式处理.)
评审结果应正式通知学生和教员.
The decisions of the AI hearing committee are final.
如果要考虑大学纪律处分,则必须将案件提交给学生问责制进行正式审查或听证会. This action must be taken prior to any fact finding. (This includes possible assignment of the XF grade.)
Committee composition for hearings
如果任何事件需要在学术诚信委员会举行听证会,至少有五名学术诚信委员会成员将听取案件. Each member should be objective. (If a conflict of interest may occur, the committee member should excuse him or herself and be replaced.)
人工智能听证委员会必须由大多数教员组成,其中一人主持听证. 此外,一名学生和至少一名学院代表?副院长办公室或学生事务处也应出席.
教员应首先从委员会定期任命的成员中选出,然后再从候补成员中选出, if necessary.
同样,学生也应该从委员会的正式成员中选出. 如果定期选出的学生委员不在, an alternate may be selected from a pool of student alternates.